Archive for July, 2010

‘Climategate’ — Here are the facts…

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Many activists, policy makers, scientists and ordinary citizens alike feel let down about the fact that the US Senate has, this week, decided not to enact climate legislation before its summer recess – and, possibly not in this year’s congress. This has emboldened some to spread misinformation about what is really occurring regarding climate change. In these days when the pen is mightier than the sword, one can only wield the pen to the extent that they are informed.

In this spirit, I ask you: Do you ever find yourself at a loss when the water cooler talk turns into climate topics that defy experience and reason? Worse, do you feel ill-equipped to form an intelligent reply, or provide a counter-argument when matters on climate change arise? Well, you are not alone. This is common among those of us who do not need scientific measurements to tell us that winters are not what they used to be — though naysayers continue to claim that the climate is the same. However, scientific measurements are valuable because hearsay and anecdotes are unreliable. So, with that in mind, who better to discuss scientific measurements than the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These ten points below, provided by NOAA, will arm you with concrete facts that will make you an informed member of our society. I copied and pasted below Eli Kintisch’s ScienceInsider article which was published online today. Go ahead, and wield that pen…

science insider header

NOAA Has 10 Answers to Allegations That ‘Climategate’ Disproves Warming

The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released a report today on 2009’s climate, which says the decade of the 2000s was the warmest since readings were first kept. In a phone interview with reporters today, Peter Stott of the U.K. Met Office, a contributor to the 224-page report, said the scientists who wrote it had sought, among other things, to draw attention to 10 variables he said “most intuitively” reflect temperature. He called that part of the report a “response” to allegations in recent months that scientists at the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia or NASA—or both—could jigger the record to fake warming, particularly by purportedly skewing records of land surface temperature. From the report:

If the land surface records were systematically flawed and the globe had not really warmed, then it would be almost impossible to explain the concurrent changes in this wide range of indicators produced by many independent groups.

What follows are the 10 variables that show warming, according to the report:

Air Temperature Near Earth’s Surface: The 1960s and 1970s were cooler than the 2000s by about 0.6°C, the 1980s cooler by about 0.35°C, and the 1990s cooler by 0.2°C. Seven sets of data were used to come to that conclusion, with some of the same raw data in several of those sets (p. 28).

Humidity: A warmer atmosphere means a moister one, and three sets of data each show a steady rise since 1970, with peaks in “1987/88, 1997/98, 2002, 2006/07, and 2009 (/10)” (p. 31).

Glaciers: A negative “mass balance” means that glaciers lost more mass than they gained; 2008 was the 18th straight year this number was negative for the world’s alpine glaciers. For example, the report says “of 93 Austrian glaciers surveyed in 2009, 85 receded, 7 were stationary, and 1 advanced”; most glaciers receded by more than 14 meters in 2009, “slightly higher than in 2008″ (p. 47).

Meanwhile, the “34 widest marine-terminating glaciers in Greenland lost 101 km2 ice area in 2009″ (p. 107). Meanwhile, Antarctica’s climate has largely warmed in the past year-although “significant ice loss has occurred along the Antarctic Peninsula and West Antarctica in the last decade.” Scientists cannot link the loss to regional warming (p. 126) but say warmer seas may be the culprit.

Snow Cover: Each decade since 1970, the extent of spring snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere has fallen more and more below the 40-year average. Winter snow cover fell in the 1980s and 1990s but rose slightly in the 2000s (p. 34).

Temperatures Over Oceans: Analysis of five sets of data shows that the air temperatures over the world’s seas have risen steadily since 1970 (p. 26).

Temperatures Over Land: Four sets of data show the same trend, with slightly less warming in the past few years (p. 26).

Ocean Temperatures: The water temperature at the surface of the ocean has risen more or less steadily since roughly the 1980s. Compared with the 1971-2000 average, 2009 was the fourth warmest year for sea temperatures, “behind 1998, 2003, and 2005, the top three warmest [ocean temperature] years since 1950″ (p. 55).

Sea Level: Since 2003, seas have risen by 2 to 3 mm a year (p. 71).

Sea Ice: The total area in Arctic seas covered by floating ice has dropped by roughly 4% per year; around Antarctica, sea ice has increased by roughly 1% per decade (details here).

Ocean Heat Content: The stored heat in the world’s seas has risen steeply since roughly 1990, according to three separate data sets (p. 58).

Chess is Brain Yoga

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

online chess

online chess

Chess has been around for centuries. It has been played and enjoyed by some of the greatest minds that have walked this planet — many of whom have extolled the virtues of playing this classic game.

Though I am not good at it, I see the mental benefits that playing chess regularly provides. The game forces you to think clearly, and to consider the consequences of your actions. Who can’t benefit from that? Studies indicate that playing chess can prolong your mental faculties; and, I say, it is a wonderful complement to any yogic regime. If you like chess, &/or are interested in learning it, GameKnot.com is an excellent place to start. Take a look and share your thoughts after clicking the icon above.

Have fun!

Vivekan

Mother Power for Clean Energy!

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

No Coal sign on MountainImage from Earthjustice.org blog

This morning, I stumbled upon some excellent news in an article published in Earthjustice’s newsletter by Brian Smith, WA Moms Summit Mt. Rainier in Call for Green Energy. This past Saturday, July 17, 2010, four moms (yes, you read that, moms) climbed Washington state’s Mt. Rainier in a statement against the use of the highly polluting, coal.

Each of these mothers have children from ages 3 – 6! (Those kids have some awesome moms.) Talk about a breath of fresh air! This is exactly what I always imagined fortunate, educated moms to do: protect their children, and the future of their children.

How these great moms are protecting their children

Since the Reagan years, it’s become somewhat acceptable and even cliché to mock those who constructively take their time to make a statement for environmental (viz. human) health. In the meantime, it has become acceptable for moms to prepare their children for a good education before kindergarten, though everyone knows that this can amount to a tremendous load of pressure on kids. Yet, I never hear moms talk about how they and their children discussed environmental pollution, and what needs to be done as a family unit to minimize everyone’s contribution to it, or, what effects worsening air quality can have on their children’s ability to breath, and overall health in general.

Climb Against Coal, image

Moms keeping it real

“Today, we demand that coal burning end in Washington,” said climber Genevieve Raymond. “The Governor’s plan to burn dirty coal for fifteen more years is unacceptable. The time to transition to clean energy is now.”

Climber Jennifer Williams said, “Every hour of every day, lax regulations allow poisonous mercury to be dumped onto the glaciers and dirty carbon into the atmosphere. Our children are counting on us to transition to renewable energy now.”

Leading by example

We don’t necessarily need to climb a mountain to get attention to our ambient environmental woes (i.e., poor air quality, dirty waterways, etc.). But, we can follow the lead that these courageous moms have taken. We can in our own neighborhoods, in front of court houses, and houses of legislature, even on the Brooklyn Bridge make a statement indicating our dissatisfaction with how the status-quo has managed our environmental problems. (Hint: Don’t blame the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA; whenever they’ve tried to do good for the public, special interests pressure congressional members, etc. to hobble the agency’s mandated motives to better our air quality, etc.)

It’s up to you and me, we’ve got to do it — demand better environmental quality; not just for us, but also for our children and posterity.

Join us,

Vivekan

July 2010

Friday, July 9th, 2010

Live every act fully, as if it were your last.